'We're at court's mercy'
By TERRY
WOSTER
Argus Leader
published: 6/21/01
RAPID CITY -- American Indians in South Dakota are at the
mercy of courts because they have little money for lawyers and often
little understanding of the system, the state's tribal government
relations commissioner said Wednesday.
Webster Two Hawk, a former chairman of the Rosebud Sioux Tribe, told
University of South Dakota researchers who are assessing racial
fairness from arrest to sentencing, that a system of justice based
on punishment is foreign to Indian people.
"We are hellbent on punishing people,'' Two Hawk said during a
public forum in Rapid City. "We are not interested in
rehabilitation in society. Our Indian culture at one time was more
aimed at bringing people together.''
Two Hawk said many Indian people don't understand the concept of
plea agreements, don't understand the adversarial system and can't
hire top defense lawyers.
"We as Lakota people are at the mercy of the court because we
don't have the money to defend ourselves,'' he said.
Steve Feimer and Richard Braunstein of USD's Government Research
Bureau are doing the study for Gov. Bill Janklow. The study is to
decide whether race is a significant factor in decisions about which
people are charged, prosecuted and sentenced after being arrested. A
U.S. Civil Rights Commission report last March concluded that many
American Indians think they aren't treated fairly in the court
system.
The current study will focus only on the state system, although some
who testified at the forum said attention also should be paid to
tribal and federal courts.
Feimer said as many as 70,000 cases between 1994 and 1999 are being
reviewed.
"In the end, we hope to find out whether, for virtually the
same crime and the same circumstances, is there any difference in
sentences received and is race a factor,'' he said.
Braunstein said the study will look at regional differences in
outcomes, county budgets for the criminal justice system and other
factors that might affect decisions on carrying a case through from
arrest to sentence. It will examine why some cases are prosecuted
while similar cases are dropped, whether Indians are involved in
plea bargains more or less often than non-Indians and what kinds of
punishments ultimately result in each case.
"We'll let the data, not us, tell the story,'' he said.
"We hope, as you do, that where we find problems, we can
address them.''
About 25 people attended parts of the forum. Many think the study
will identify racial disparity in sentencing and all other aspects
of the criminal justice system.
'Money talks'
Indian men and women understand they are at a disadvantage because
they have little money and must rely on public defenders or
court-appointed lawyers, said Zelda Gallegos of Rapid City.
"If you have money, money talks. A good lawyer will cost good
money,'' she said. "When the money starts to run out, they
(Indian defendants) say, 'OK, plea bargain.' ''
She recommended more involvement by the Indian community in the
court system, "not favoring any one race but looking at what's
happening.''
Braunstein said he hopes the study will lead to a comparison of
what's happening in the state court system and the federal court
system.
'Indian from television'
Marie Lange of Rapid City said Indian lawyers are needed to
represent Indian defendants. Such people might not even need to be
licensed by the state, if they understood the system and could be
advocates for Indian clients. And stereotypes need to be smashed to
give American Indians a fair hearing in the system, she said.
"When you go in front of a white jury, they see that Indian
from television,'' Lange said.
Lange agreed with Two Hawk that the state court system lacks an
understanding of the American Indian concept of restorative justice,
which means the offender is treated within the community, not locked
away.
"The state court only deals with the law, not a culture or a
way of life,'' she said. "We've never believed in
incarceration.''
Lange also said that a system based on restitution and
rehabilitation, rather than punishment, would bring more evenhanded
treatment for Indian people. Up to 90 percent of the crimes by
Indian people are alcohol-related, she said. The offenders need
treatment and counseling, but they get prison time.
"They end up in prison being treated for the symptom, not the
cause,'' she said.
Two Hawk said racial profiling, the practice of law officers
stopping a disproportionate number of people from minority groups,
should be studied for a broader answer to court problems for Indian
people.
"Maybe we need to be looking at it someplace, so we can stop
this before it gets to court,'' he said.
The current study doesn't include profiling, Feimer said. There
isn't a store of information on that topic for the researchers to
use. Proposals to create a profiling study were killed in the last
session of the state Legislature.
More serious charges
Janet Thompson, a Rosebud Sioux Tribe member and former law officer
and criminal investigator, said Indians sometimes are charged with
felonies that would be misdemeanors for non-Indians. She also said
few Indian people are judged by a jury of peers because few juries
include Indian members. She suggested that courts be allowed to draw
Indian jurors from across the state, rather than only from the
county or court circuit.
"If you have a Todd County case, people are all related, so
that eliminates them,'' Thompson said.
One of the complaints the U.S. Civil Rights Commission heard several
times during hearings in Rapid City late in 1999 was about the
inadequacy of defense lawyers for Indian people, said John Dulles,
regional director for the federal commission.
"Is there any hard data to help us understand how important a
factor that is?'' he asked.
Feimer said the study will look at the outcomes when defendants have
their own lawyer, a court-appointed lawyer or public defender, and
no lawyer.
Braunstein said it would be difficult to gauge the effectiveness of
the lawyer. The years of experience could be noted, but that
wouldn't necessarily show the effectiveness of the lawyer.
Few studies have focused directly on American Indians and sentencing
disparities, Braunstein said. The current one should be considered
the first of a series that looks at the South Dakota experience on a
yearly basis, he said.
"There's so much that needs to be studied,'' he said. "I
just don't think we're going to get as far as you want us to go.''
Gloria Tyon-Kozak of Rapid City, who helped organize the forum, said
most people understand that the process will be long.
"I know we can't resolve this problem in our generation,'' she
said. "But this is a start.''
Reach Terry Woster at 605-224-2760 or twoster@midco.net
All content
Copyright © 2001 Argus
Leader.